Visit Belarius's column >>

BELARIUSHome Page

Look close, listen close, think hard.
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 54; Links Seeded: 1033
Member Since: 10/2006

Thinking, Positive: A Few Reasons I Support Barack Obama

advertisement

In response to Spikgary's challenge to inject some positivity into the Vine, I would like to outline just a few of the major reasons I have for supporting Barack Obama, reasons that I encourage you to consider and (if you are so inclined) agree or disagree with.

Transparency: The True Measure Of Reform

Transparency isn't a central issue for most voters. Yes, everyone agrees that transparency in policy-making is generally a good thing, but most people are focused on "bread-and-butter" issues like taxes. Well, transparency is one of my areas of focus. As Lawrence Lessig's Change Congress movement explains:

Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and we would all benefit from a cleaner Congress if more of its proceedings, and the proceedings of its members, were public.

In this particular respect, Obama is just one of many Senators who has made a difference with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, which created the USA Spending website. Thanks to this site and to the data it makes public, we the people are able to have a substantive debate about the policy behavior of our presidential and vice-presidential nominees. It bears emphasizing that without this legislation, either campaigns could make up numbers with relative impunity; instead, this database allows us (and the press) to hold the candidates to their records in a way seen in no previous presidential election. For the sake of full disclosure, it should be noted that John McCain was also a cosponsor of this bill - indeed, after a "secret hold" against the bill was defeated, it passed unanimously, illustrating, perhaps the political expediency of supporting transparency in principle.

But Obama's strong position on transparency extends beyond his congressional record and principle and into his practices. His presidential campaign has not only raised record-shattering amounts of money, but has done so almost exclusively (96%) from individual contributors, making his a truly people-driven campaign. Among the major candidates, he is rated highest by the watchdog group OpenSecrets.org for quality of disclosure, and he has also been forthcoming with personal records. I have little doubt that Obama's campaign promise to open the doors of government to the people is a legitimate one because it is supported by the operations of his campaign, and by his personal conduct through the campaign process. In this election, he has led on transparency not by polemic, but by example.

The Constitution: To Defend And Uphold

In my opinion, not enough is made of Obama's qualifications as a Constitutional scholar. Indeed, both Obama and Biden have juris doctorates, making the Obama-Biden ticket is the best-equipped to understand the Constitution they hope to pledge themselves in defense of. There is little doubt that the next president will very likely appoint Supreme Court justices, and Obama's legal qualifications help to ensure that appointments to the highest court in the land won't be delegated to an underling, or subverted for political purposes. Understanding the Constitution, not just in terms of today's talking points, but rather at a deeper level that includes Constitution history is crucial to understanding the role the Supreme Court plays, and I believe Obama is the best-equipped candidate to make that judgment.

Obama is not merely a Constitutional scholar: at the University of Chicago, he was also a Constitutional instructor, as well as an instructor in campaign finance law and civil rights. Many Americans, in my opinion, have lost sight of the nuance and complexity of the Constitution, especially as regards its interpretation. Many more, served poorly by failing Civics classrooms, have never had a clear understanding of our Constitutional rights in the first place. I feel that the next president will have a responsibility not only to interpret the Constitution but to explain his interpretations to the American people. As someone who has experience illuminating the Constitution for students, he is the best candidate to illuminate it for the next generation of Americans.

I encourage anyone skeptical of Obama's qualifications as an instructor to take a look at some of his course material. Here, for example, are several finals as well as a syllabus for his class on Current Issues in Racism and the Law. We need a president who can give America the enthusiasm and interest in the law that Obama gave to his students.

The Economy: A Fundamentally New Direction

Obama has explained, often emphatically, that he has a comprehensive plan to put the economy back on track, but even some Obama supporters are not entirely sure what the details of that plan are. This, as economic columnist David Leonhardt spells out, is not because Obama's plan is fuzzy or vague, but rather because it represents a new kind of policy, distinct from (but sharing elements with) both classical Republican and Democratic economic views. In his lengthy article "How Obama Reconciles Dueling Views on Economy," Leonhardt describes Obama's plan as one that seeks to undercut the long-standing assumptions of both parties and take the best elements from both models.

Obama, for example, understands the power of the free market and seeks to harness it in new ways to help combat government inefficiency. At the same time, Obama is keenly aware of the growing income gap in America, and the reduction in economic mobility enjoyed by Americans: the growing stratification of incomes makes more likely that you will remain in the income bracket you were born in. Obama's tax proposals, in particular, do not square with any traditional ten-second description, because it is a new approach to a failing system. As reviewed by the independent Tax Policy Center, Obama's plan will not only do much to help the low- and middle-income Americans who are suffering the most from the sagging economy, but also does not cut taxes so deeply that the operation of government must be funded by big-ticket loans and a growing national debt. In my opinion, Obama's plan will both bring immediate relief to American families but also move us back toward the budget surpluses enjoyed under President Clinton.

More broadly, Obama appears to understand that the current state of the American economy (and the recent crises it has faced) are part of a global problem. I encourage anyone worried about the economy to listen to "The Giant Pool of Money," a piece by This American Life explaining how the mortgage crisis was not the fault of a specific element of the market, but rather a systematic failure at every level. I believe Obama understands that fixing the economy is not just about changing a few dozen name-plates in Washington, but is more fundamentally about reforming the way our economy works, and how important creating meaningful accountability is.

Energy, of course, is the topic du jour in the economic sphere, and Obama's foresight reveals itself here, as well. Obama's congressional record on energy issues reveals that he believes in the profound ingenuity of Americans not only to solve the energy crisis, but to reinvigorate the economy in the process. At the same time, his record reveals that his is not an inflexible ideologue: he wants to see real problems fixed, rather than political battles won. He was among the Senate Democrats who recently supported a compromise on offshore drilling in order to bring everyone to the table, for example. His proposed energy plan includes big incentives to create a new energy economy here at home that would create jobs and undercut outsourcing.

Foreign Policy: Embracing, and Being Embraced By, The World

It is easy for Americans to forget how highly esteemed America is abroad. Even today, with historically high levels of anti-American sentiment in many places around the world, most foreigners see America as a nation with fundamentally sound values and as a beacon for democracy. The role a foreign policy plays in this dynamic is, I think, perhaps best captured by the following quote:

It really depends on how our nation conducts itself in foreign policy. If we're an arrogant nation, they'll resent us. If we're a humble nation, but strong, they'll welcome us.

- George W. Bush, 2000 Presidential Debates

I believe the world is ready to welcome America back into the world community, and I believe Obama is the candidate to do that. Obama said as much in his speech before 200,000 Europeans in Berlin. He explained that there are world problems before us that no single nation can solve, and that the nations of the world must work together to resolve them. The threats of violence, poverty, famine, and disease are world problems that we can do far more to solve together than apart. My statement that Obama can restore America's standing is hardly imaginary: Obama is extremely popular abroad, and takes little imagination to see the relationship between that popularity and the leverage an Obama administration would have on foreign leaders.

Clearly, however, foreign policy is not primarily about popularity. Obama's appeal abroad is relevant, but not central: what is central is the question of "How will the next president face global issues?" In addition to bringing allies to the table, we must also have clear and effective plans to address not only terrorism, but poverty, sanitation, injustice, and climate change. Obama has made clear that he understands both the threat and the nuance of terrorism, but also understands that "foreign policy" means more than military victory. Obama has long advocated the advantages of a multi-pronged approach (including, diplomacy, economic power, and military force) that has recently gained more widespread support. With Biden's encyclopedic knowledge of foreign policy, Obama will be in a position to fully employ every component of America's power (both hard and soft) abroad.

Conclusion: The Best Candidate For A Difficult Era

There is no doubt that the next President will be handed a calamitous tray of problems. The status quo is clearly unacceptable, which is why both parties made their conventions about "Change." I believe that a whole host of reasons exist for believing that Barack Obama is the best candidate for the job. His intelligence, his judgment, his pragmatism, his willingness to meet in the middle rather than promote partisan obstructionism, and his desire to bring more Americans back into the political discourse make him more than just the best candidate for the job: it makes him a remarkable candidate by the standards of any era.

  • 27 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
17
6.2
{"commentId":2931721,"authorDomain":"belarius"}

There are many other issues I could have discussed: Education, for example. But I didn't want to make this already-lengthy article any more exhaustive.

I want to clarify something, however: While I think Spikgary's challenge is laudable, I also believe that we the voters have a responsibility to discuss both candidates, both as regards the positive and the negative - that's part of why I think transparency is so important. While I have made a concerted effort to refrain from directed criticism in the above article, I won't oppose them down here in the comments. Speak your minds!

{"commentId":2931721,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"belarius"}
  • 7 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 10:26 PM EDT
{"commentId":2932064,"authorDomain":"barry-llc"}

Bravo, Belarius for an excellent article! Your approach was reasoned and rational and did not lapse into attacks on or the use of pejoratives to describe the "supposed character faults" of another candidate. A wonderful move forward in pursuit of intelligent and civil discourse!

{"commentId":2932064,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"barry-llc"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#2 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:08 PM EDT
{"commentId":2932160,"authorDomain":"etasch1"}

Belarius - I took a different approach with Spikgary, but yours went right to the point of his challenge. Good job.

{"commentId":2932160,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"etasch1"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:19 PM EDT
{"commentId":2932234,"authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}

Excellent points, Belarius.

{"commentId":2932234,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#4 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:27 PM EDT
{"commentId":2932455,"authorDomain":"mhally"}

Thank you Belarius for another excellent post.

{"commentId":2932455,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"mhally"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Sun Sep 14, 2008 11:57 PM EDT
{"commentId":2932482,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

Leading by example is what I try to do. I know some others at NV do as well.

A couple of others...well, I don't know. A few folks just post up flame-based titles for articles and wait for some traffic. You can always tell those articles because they have a poor vote-to-comment ratio, which Calvin Tang once said is a good measure of a solid article.

Just in case you don't know how Newsvine traffic works (if you are not running Google Analytics), here's how it works.

September 1-14 at my column. Total visits, 14,415 as of this morning. Total pageviews, 18,000 or so. Percentage of visits through Google searches: 30%. Percentage of visits from outside links to articles: 55%. Percentage of visitors originating from Newsvine: 12%. The remaining three percent come from 'other sources'.

Surprised? The only thing votes are good for is keeping an article visible on the front page of Newsvine for a few extra hours maybe. That's it. I have many articles with more than a 1,000 views for a month...and yet only have a few votes and comments.

The Leaderboard, my friends, is an illusion. I've been in the top 25 just twice, and never on the three month or all time list.

Payment last month from Newsvine: $96.00. What can I say...it was a slow month. Traffic for the payment that is coming up is almost double from that one.

I have an article on my column you can check out called 'How to Drive Traffic to a News Column' which I highly recommend. Of course, the 'old-liners' didn't like it. One of them posted up a satire about it a day or two later. I won't mention who or the name of the article.

He can do satire. Meanwhile, I have to transfer some PayPal funds. (laughs)

{"commentId":2932482,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#6 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:02 AM EDT
{"commentId":2932626,"authorDomain":"belarius"}

I believe the article Robert is talking about is this one. As tp the satire of said-article, I, also, won't name names. ;-)

{"commentId":2932626,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"belarius"}
  • 2 votes
#6.1 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:26 AM EDT
{"commentId":2948877,"authorDomain":"j-clarahan"}

You get paid by newsvine?

{"commentId":2948877,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"j-clarahan"}
  • 2 votes
#6.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:06 AM EDT
{"commentId":2953732,"authorDomain":"fitzright"}

chelli:
Every contributor here on Newsvine gets a cut of the advertising in their own column. Robert is one of the more successful contributors -because I only netted $ 0,33 at last payout- but still, pretty neat system.

{"commentId":2953732,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"fitzright"}
  • 5 votes
#6.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:26 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2932529,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

Belarius: I forgot to address your actual article. Sorry about that. You write VERY well. Now it's time to add some images. Check out that article I mentioned above. You already have the hard part down, that is...you can write. Now it's time to just dress it up a little.

What happens is that after a while people will start linking to articles and hits to those articles will continue. I get views on articles I wrote more than a year ago. With your talent, I know you can do it.

{"commentId":2932529,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#7 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:10 AM EDT
{"commentId":2932692,"authorDomain":"belarius"}
You write VERY well.

Thank you! Really, I'm very flattered that it merits the use of caps.

Now it's time to add some images.

I assume my "Probama" logo doesn't count? ;-)

Is there a way to add images in a more structured way? Something I find frustrating about Newsvine is the extent to which (a) images tend to crowd out the text and force it into a very narrow column and (b) the fact that the images just pile up in a right-justified column, ignoring any context they might derive from the article itself. I understand the logistic reasons Newsvine wants to avoid giving us direct XHTML control over the images, but I tend to want to stick to one illustration per article unless I have a little more control. Your insights on the matter are most welcome.

What happens is that after a while people will start linking to articles and hits to those articles will continue.

As far as drumming up outside viewership, what position do you take on submitting articles to aggregators like Reddit or Digg?

{"commentId":2932692,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"belarius"}
  • 2 votes
#7.1 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:34 AM EDT
{"commentId":2933152,"authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}

Okay...here's the article on Boosting Traffic to a News Column for the rest. Copy and print it up if you wish.

I don't like Digg. You'll get a lot more solid links from outside sources at Newsvine. Once you start getting three or four of those 'Newsvine LinkLove' messages in your email a week, you will know you are going in the right direction.

Install Google Analytics on your column. Do it on your bio page, below the area where your bio finally ends. Doesn't show up visibly anyway.

{"commentId":2933152,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"adventurebooks"}
  • 4 votes
#7.2 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:51 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2932871,"authorDomain":"azsky13"}

Belarius... I am so glad that you took up the challenge! I considered it myself, but I really don't have the time right now. But, I could not have done half as well as you have done.

You have written a wonderful article with supporting links to back up your statements. Well done!

I haven't been commenting on much of anything lately as I haven't been on the site much and I don't have the time to follow them up. When I am here I have just lurked. But, I was compelled to break from lurker status to comment on this and on Spikgary's article.

{"commentId":2932871,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"azsky13"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#8 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:01 AM EDT
{"commentId":2932877,"authorDomain":"belarius"}
I was compelled to break from lurker status

Welcome back to the fold. ;-) And thanks!

{"commentId":2932877,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"belarius"}
  • 2 votes
#8.1 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:03 AM EDT
{"commentId":2932978,"authorDomain":"azsky13"}

Thanks, but I am afraid my return is only temporary. I actually should be doing homework now. I went back to school this semester after being out of a classroom for 33 years. It is a lot of work!

I have temporarily shut down my column, but I come back when I can just to check on a few friends. I added you to that list tonight.

You might want to consider doing more articles in this manner possibly covering some of the other issues that you were not able to cover.

I am clipping you to a couple more groups as well...

{"commentId":2932978,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"azsky13"}
  • 2 votes
#8.2 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:20 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2933605,"authorDomain":"dhaasgo"}

Transperency?-What a joke. The Obama campaign went to the DOJ(Department Of Justice) and other federal government agencies to try and sue them to keep the latesest information(coming out of The University Of Illinois) about Obama's ties to the terrorst William Ayers from being released to the public. The Obama campaign has something to hide-Big Time.

{"commentId":2933605,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"dhaasgo"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#9 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:13 AM EDT
{"commentId":2933636,"authorDomain":"belarius"}

I believe this is the story you are referring to. The argument Obama is making is not, strictly speaking, that the ad must be blocked on principle, but rather that the actions of its creators, the "American Issues Project" constitute a violation of campaign finance law. More specifically: the charge is that by spending $2.8 million on ad buys, investor Harold Simmons is violating the $2300 limit on individual donation and avoiding those limits by failing to direct AIP activities through the proper channels.

Now, we can quibble over whether the Obama camp complained to the DoJ as a purely tactical move on account of the ad's content, or as a tactical move generally designed to combat the "Swiftboat" tactics used to unfairly malign Kerry in 2004, or as a principled move on the basis of the AIP's failure to be transparent, or any combination of the above. But it has been pretty clear that the AIP is a swiftboating operation. If the McCain campaign wants to run the ad (and why shouldn't it, if the substance of the ad is true?), then let Simmons donate the ad (and $2300) to the McCain campaign and let them pay for the ad buys.

{"commentId":2933636,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"belarius"}
  • 3 votes
#9.1 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:30 AM EDT
{"commentId":2936422,"authorDomain":"azsky13"}

@ David Haas... We are trying to have a civil debate on the issues here. By the look of your comments here and in other places, you appear to have your own agenda. If you wish to discuss issues come with facts and links to sources to prove your facts. Otherwise you are just a lot of hot air trying to throw an honest discussion off track.

So what do you have to say about the issues in the article that Belarius has written?

{"commentId":2936422,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"azsky13"}
  • 2 votes
#9.2 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:41 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2933627,"authorDomain":"dhaasgo"}

Belarius-How Obama can even show up at the 9/11 memorial in NYC is a disgrace. He should not even be allowed to run for President. The FBI, and the CIA should have done a background check on him before he ran for President.

{"commentId":2933627,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"dhaasgo"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#10 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:25 AM EDT
{"commentId":2944006,"authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}

Every politician has to undergo a background check when applying for office... Same goes even for regular government employees.

{"commentId":2944006,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"arcanebliss"}
  • 3 votes
#10.1 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:17 PM EDT
{"commentId":2944952,"authorDomain":"etasch1"}

David - I missed your comments earlier or I would have responded sooner. Your opinions border on paranoia. There's nothing wrong with being critical of someone, but your statements are outrageous. Something in your life has made you very angry and bitter. I would suggest you get professional help or perhaps that boogie man will really get you when your sleeping. Come on, lighten up, Obama may not be your man, but he is an inspirational leader. No intelligent, rational Viner is going to buy your trash. In fact, I'm mad at myself for even responding to you.

{"commentId":2944952,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"etasch1"}
  • 2 votes
#10.2 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 10:27 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2933678,"authorDomain":"jfrank"}

An amazing piece.

{"commentId":2933678,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"jfrank"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#11 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:53 AM EDT
{"commentId":2933746,"authorDomain":"dc4hilburn"}

Belarius: I appreciate your article. I have not yet had a chance to go to the links provided, but will do so later today:-)As an Indy, I most likely will be voting for McCain, barring something huge coming up. However, your intelligent, non-venomous arguement would serve as a great example to a number of fellow Obama supporters:-) God bless!

{"commentId":2933746,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"dc4hilburn"}
  • 6 votes
Reply#12 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:32 AM EDT
{"commentId":2933761,"authorDomain":"belarius"}

You are, then, one of those precious rarities on the Internet: someone who is openly civil with those who do not completely agree with you. I salute you, and wish more people with your tact could come forward on both sides of this debate.

{"commentId":2933761,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"belarius"}
  • 5 votes
#12.1 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:42 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":2941470,"authorDomain":"fitzright"}

As an outsider looking in on the election, I can say that what you are writing on Obama's foreign policy is spot on.

I was in Paris the other day and got mixed up in a discussion on politics with an airline crew from the US. They were amazed by the way American politics were discussed in Europe, and they sensed they were more welcome than ever before (not that Americans weren't welcome in Paris or anywhere else in Europe, they felt they were greeted with bigger smiles and people were more open to them. Strictly hearsay, although I spent a pleasant hour with them after dinner.) Let's just say that a lot of Europeans are rooting for Obama and are looking at America and Americans with different eyes.

At this point you have leaders that are not widely respected, weak diplomacy and strong military, all the characteristics of a schoolyard bully. If America manages to have respected leadership once again, strong diplomacy and strong military you will find that negotiations with a lot of countries in Europe on anti-terrorist issues and economic measures will go rather smoothly from that moment on.

All gross generalizations here, I know. But the rest of the free world needs real change too in this grim era, and Obama is the perfect candidate to accomplish that.

{"commentId":2941470,"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930","authorDomain":"fitzright"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#13 - Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:20 PM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"358018","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"358018","contentId":"1866930"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking